George Arthur

George Arthur is a teacher at Wellgate Primary school, Mapplewell, unfortunately he is also a key official and organiser of the left wing extremist organization UAF.

Recent acts of violence, intimidation can be found all over the internet, the demo outside the BBC studios when Question time was being filmed was the worst i have ever seen. 19 of the uaf were arrested for disorder.

This is not the type of violent and intimiating behaviour we expect teachers to be associated with.

In addition, George Arthur is attempting to ban people he disagrees with, politically, from engaging in the democratic political process in Barnsley town centre. Therefore parents can have little confidence that George Arthur is teaching with political impartiality in that he is pushing his own extreme left wing views onto pupils.

It is law that teachers must teach with impartiality.

We can have little confidence that George Arthur is not discriminating against those children he sees as being too right wing.

The UAF are a violent communist organisation whose hatred extends far beyond the BNP to ordinary non political people who legitimately critisize immigration policies of the Socialist Workers Party, New Labour, Stalin or the ideas of Karl Marx.

The UAF hurl offensive abuse like " Nazi scum " at any individual who disagrees with them on these issues including former BBC talk show presenter Robert Killroy silk and sky at night presenter Patrick Moore.

George Arthur has brought Wellgate Primary School and the teaching profession into disrepute, he should be releived of his teaching duties with immediate effect to safeguard and protect our children from any political influance or bias.

George Arthur has shown himself to be intolerant to the point he associates himself with an organisation that uses violence and intimidation. This is not a suitable role model for our children to follow.

Please sign this petition to remove all left wing activists from teaching in our schools.

SIGN HERE

Re- petition

Sorry to anyone that tried to sign, the site which does the petitions have taken it down for ( legal reasons ) mmm, wonder if it would have been ok if it had been the other way round !

Remove George Arthur from teaching immediately.

Sign the petition here

Less than 20 miles from the Tarn

Arrests made after horror attack on teen

A LONE teenage boy was knocked unconscious, stabbed in the hand and had his teeth knocked loose by a gang who stole his bicycle.

His traumatised mum said her son was out with friends at Rectory Park in Thornhill, just hours after the family returned from holiday on Friday.

He was expected home at 9pm, but at 8.50pm the gang of about 10 to 15, who had been in the park, chased him.

They hit his head with a brick, stabbed him in the hand with a screwdriver and kicked him, before taking his bike, a £200 blue and green BMX given to him at Christmas.

The 14-year-old tried to stagger home, but collapsed unconscious at the bottom of Frank Lane, where he was found by a passer-by.

The boy had his two front teeth knocked loose, his hand was broken, he needed five stitches to a head wound, and was stabbed in the other hand.

His 40-year-old mother, who did not want to be named, said: "Nothing prepared me for what I saw. He was on the bench in the bus stop. The guy was supporting him, holding him up and he had a towel on his head.

"He was covered in blood and you could see skull in the cut on his forehead. I thought I was going to lose him. I was a wreck."

The boy was taken to Dewsbury and District Hospital and stayed overnight before being taken to Pinderfields for further treatment.

His mum added: "He doesn't want to go out, he won't leave the house. It's upset the whole family."

Insp Jenny Thompson said: "This was a vicious, unprovoked attack that has left him with serious injuries."

Last night, police arrested three Asian youths in the Savile Town area in connection with the attack.

The 14-year-old boy and two 16-year-old boys are currently in custody.

FROM HERE

Muslim cemetery in Dodworth

Barnsley Council have decided to start work building a Muslim burial ground in Dodworth without consulting any of the residents. No planning notices were put out anywhere and local Councillors deny any knowledge of it. Councillor Phil Birkinshaw told one resident “ I don't know anything about it, I've just returned from my holidays”.

So who is responsible for the underhanded tactics? Is Mr Birkinshaw telling the truth? He either knew all about it or he was also kept in the dark by the corrupt Liebour councillors.

It goes to show that the Labour controlled council think they can break any rules they wish. If you were to put up a building on your property without the required planning permission, they would be down on you like a ton of bricks.

We also hear that the ground where they have started digging is actually an old burial ground, although there are no headstones present to prove this, we are however looking into this and will keep everyone informed.

Barnsley Chronicle said they wouldn't touch the story with a barge pole.. Well, what do you expect from the comical.

A full report to follow soon.

Give Nick Griffin MEP a fair-hearing on Question Time

Published by Patrick Harrington on Oct 24, 2009

Category: Civil Rights

Region: United Kingdom

Target: The Director General of the BBC

Web site: http://civilliberty.org.uk

Sign the petition here

Labour ‘conspired to organise mass migration to UK’

The huge increases in immigration over the past decade were in part a politically-motivated attempt by ministers to socially engineer a more multicultural Britain, a former government adviser said yesterday.

Andrew Neather, a speechwriter who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration”.

As well as bringing in hundreds of thousands more migrants to plug labour market gaps, there was also a “driving political purpose” behind immigration policy, he revealed. Ministers hoped to radically change the country and by doing so “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”.

But Mr Neather said senior Labour figures were reluctant to discuss the policy, fearing it would alienate its “core working-class vote”.

Critics said the revelations showed a “conspiracy” within government to impose mass immigration for “cynical” political reasons.

On Question Time on Thursday night, Mr Straw was repeatedly quizzed about whether Labour’s immigration policies had left the door open for the BNP.

Writing in a London newspaper, Mr Neather revealed the “major shift” in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office. The published version promoted the labour market case for immigration but Mr Neather said unpublished versions contained additional reasons. He wrote: “Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.

“I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended — even if this wasn’t its main purpose — to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.”

The “deliberate policy”, from late 2000 until “at least February last year”, when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.
Mr Neather defended the policy, saying mass immigration has “enriched” Britain, and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place. But he acknowledged that “nervous” ministers made no mention of the policy for fear of alienating Labour voters.

REST HERE

A REMINDER -

Malik was arrested during the anti white Bradford riots, but let off because daddy was a politician at the time! If i'm wrong - sue me...



SO KEEP VOTING LABOUR!!!! What will it take for you to wake up? I can't possibly list what they have done to you, I don't have a spare month! They rob your money, they replace you by importing cheap labour (that the unions have already recruited overseas before they even arrive), they send our young boys & girls into an illegal war and continue to favour foreign nationals over our elderly, but you still vote Liebour! There isn't much more time. Help us to help you while we still can, because the way it's going, very soon, you will be beyond help.

Something Stinks In Barnsley

The results are in from yesterdays by-election in the St Helen's ward, Barnsely and it was good to see the British National Party thrash the Liberal Democrats, UKIP and the conservatives.
But something just does not seem right to me about the result.

Roy BUTTERWOOD Labour Party 1520
Lisa BROOKSBANK British National Party 590
Daniel Clive PICKERING Independent 171
Neil ROBINSON UKIP 94
Clive WATKINSON Conservatives 89
Eddie GOUTHWAITE Liberal Democrats 78

OK there was a slight drop in the BNP vote compared to last years results

Lab 965
BNP 635
Ind 299
Con 200

But where the hell did all those extra Labour voters come from? The Labour Party is loathed at this moment in time because of their MPs theft of taxpayers money. They are hated for continuing to getting our soldiers slaughtered in illegal wars. They are despised because of their immigration policies. So where did those votes come from?

No something is not quite right about this result. Have immigrant numbers trebled since last year? I look forward to your comments.

A big well done to Lisa and her team who worked like Trojans during the campaign. Proud of you all.

FROM GREEN ARROW

Barnsley Nationalists would like to wish BNP candidate - Lisa Brooksbank, all the best in the St Helens by-election tomorrow and thank all the team who have worked extremely hard in the ward for the last few weeks. The same applies to our colleagues in Boston, Lincs. Let us hope we secure victory in both elections.

VOTE FOR CHANGE! VOTE LISA BROOKSBANK

Thursday 15th October 2009

It's your chance to make a difference.

LIARS, BUGGERS & THIEVES

THINKING OF VOTING LABOUR THIS THURSDAY? TAKE A LOOK HERE FIRST.

Territorial Army told to stop training for six months to save money

The Territorial Army has been told to stop training for six months to save millions of pounds from the Army’s budget because of growing financial pressure on the Ministry of Defence.

Drill-hall instruction, weekend exercises and all other training associated with the TA will stop, cutting costs by about £20 million.

The Land Force budget of the Army has been cut by £54 million, and the TA is the first to be affected. The huge cut in TA spending will mean that the weekend warriors will not be paid. “They are paid to go training, and if there is no training, they won’t get paid,” a Ministry of Defence official said.

A spokesman insisted that the savings and the ban on training would not affect the TA’s operational contribution to Afghanistan, where about 500 Territorial soldiers are serving. There are also ten TA soldiers in Iraq.

REST HERE

Bradford man (SCHOOL TEACHER) had 3,000 indecent images (OF CHILDREN)

A Bradford schoolteacher who admitted being attracted to teenage boys downloaded nearly 3,000 indecent images of children from the internet, a Court heard today.

Police found a total of 2,970 images on 29-year-old Thomas Nassiri’s computer.

Leeds Crown Court was told that nine out of ten of the photographs were “level one”, the least serious of five levels. But 89 pictures were at level four.

The Recorder of Leeds, Judge Peter Collier QC, imposed a 12-week prison sentence. But he suspended it for two years to enable Nassiri to attend a Sex Offenders Treatment Programme, which probation said would considerably benefit him.

Nassiri, who had pleaded guilty to 21 charges of possessing pornographic images of children, will also be supervised for two years by the probation service, and was made subject of a Sexual Offences Prevention Order and ordered to register as a sex offender for five years.

REST HERE

Not sent down and only on the nonse register for 5 years??

The Gravy Chain continues....

Tory councillor claims £800-a-month allowance despite being on three-month 'extended holiday' in Australia

A Tory councillor has been claiming his £800-a-month allowance despite being on an 'extended holiday' in Australia for the last three months, it has emerged.

Christopher Harris has been 10,000 miles away travelling since July.

Today his political rivals on Barnet Council in north London have branded his astonishing behaviour 'unacceptable' and 'immoral'.

Mr Harris, 35, is claiming more than £800-a-month council allowance to serve the residents of Golders Green in north London.

Jack Cohen, Lib Dem councillor for neighbouring Child's Hill ward, said: 'This is unacceptable.

'Whilst Clllr Harris is waltzing Matilda in the Outback the rest of us are slogging away.

'How long have they known about this?'

REST HERE

Woman subjected to sex attack

DETECTIVES are appealing for witnesses after a 65-year-old woman was subjected to a serious sexual assault in Basingstoke at the weekend. The attack took place between 10pm on Saturday, and 3am on Sunday. The woman has told police she was approached by a man at the Top of the Town who walked with her and then dragged her into an alleyway and seriously sexually assaulted her. He walked off and she walked towards Festival Place. The victim is around 5ft 5ins tall and was wearing a distinctive blue and white jacket with stripes running vertically down each arm at the time of the incident. The man is described as mixed race, aged between 28 and 35, 5ft 7ins to 5ft 8ins and of muscular, stocky build, with black, curly hair. He was wearing blue jeans and a jacket. Detective Constable Catherine Stacey, of Basingstoke CID, said police were taking the allegation seriously. She said:

REST HERE

RISE OF SECRET UK ISLAMIC SCHOOLS

MORE than 1,000 kids are being taught “religious studies” in 40 back street Islamic schools in Britain’s al-Qaida heartland, it was revealed last night.

Police chiefs fear extremists could be using the unregulated academies, known as “madrassas”, to preach a gospel of terrorism in Birmingham.

The schools, converted houses on the city’s sprawling estates, are not inspected by education officials or watchdog Ofsted.

Council officials admit they do not know what the children are being taught and none of the “teachers” has undergone criminal records checks.

A leaked report from the Ministry of Defence, MI5 and Special Branch identified Birmingham as one of Britain’s main recruiting centres for al-Qaida.

One senior anti-terrorist officer said: “These schools are unregulated, uncontrolled, and potential breeding grounds for young terrorists.’’

Muslim Birmingham MP Khalid Mahmood, 48, wants the city council to step in and start regulating them.

He said it was “utter nonsense” they were allowed to operate unfettered.
A city council education department spokesman said madrassas operated in a “grey area” because they were classed as neither schools nor churches.

And an Ofsted spokesman said it did not inspect madrassas as it was not required to do so by the Department of Education.

SOURCE

So our 1,000 years of history ends like this

The creation of a European superstate has moved a step closer, after the Irish people voted to accept the Lisbon Treaty, paving the way for a powerful new President of Europe.

In a result greeted with relief in Downing Street and dismay in the Tory Party, more than two-thirds of the Irish electorate voted Yes in the country’s second referendum on the treaty.

The ballot, hailed by European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso as ‘a great day for Ireland and for Europe’, followed a frantic campaign by pro-Europeans to reverse Ireland’s overwhelming No vote last year. Now, only Poland and the Czech Republic of the EU’s 27 countries have yet to approve it.

Critics say the treaty, which aims to ‘streamline’ EU institutions to mimic the functions of a nation state, represents the biggest threat to British sovereignty since the invasion of William the Conqueror in 1066.

Tony Blair is strongly tipped to be anointed as the new European President, possibly within weeks, creating a headache for David Cameron as he heads to Manchester for his party conference.

The Conservative leader says a Tory Government would hold a British referendum on the treaty if it had not been fully ratified when the party came to power, but refuses to be drawn on what its position would be if the treaty was already in force.

Here Peter Hitchens looks at why the Irish changed their minds and considers the threat the new European superstate presents to Britain...

READ IT ALL HERE

Then take a look here

If children are taught that patriotism is wrong, Britain's very identity is at stake

One of the most startling aspects of our society at present is the way things that were once considered to be virtues have now become the object of intense disapproval, and vice versa.

A recent survey of teachers by London University's Institute of Education found that some three-quarters of them believed it was their duty to warn their pupils about the dangers of patriotism.

Once upon a time, loving your country enough that you were prepared to die for it was held to be the highest virtue.

Indeed, without patriotism there would be no one serving in the Armed Forces.
For the past 1,000 years, it has given the people of these islands the strength and courage to repel invaders and defeat the enemies of liberty.

Is it not extraordinary that such affection for your country should now be considered so objectionable that children should be told it is positively dangerous?

One teacher said that praising patriotism excluded non-British pupils.

'Patriotism about being British divides groups along racial lines, when we aim to bring pupils to an understanding of what makes us the same.
'
But on the contrary, patriotism is what binds us together through a shared sense of belonging and a desire to defend what we all have in common.

What this teacher seemed to be saying was that children from immigrant backgrounds can't have that shared sense of belonging because they are not really British. Is that not itself a racist attitude?

And if such children really are merely foreign visitors, it is even more extraordinary that teachers should tailor the education of children who are British to suit the few who are not.

But then, some of these teachers seemed unwilling to acknowledge the concept of citizenship at all, spouting idiotic nonsense instead about promoting 'universal brotherhood' or the need to 'identify as humans'.

With no awareness of any irony (they probably don't understand what that means either) some said promoting patriotism was a form of 'brainwashing'.
So what, pray, is promoting 'universal brotherhood'? Planet earth to teachers: make contact, please!

As the researchers who conducted this survey point out, much of history and politics is incomprehensible without understanding the power of patriotic sentiment.

Accordingly, they say, schools should ensure that pupils not only understand what patriotism is, but are also 'equipped to make reasoned judgments about the place it should occupy in their own emotional lives'.

Surely that's the point. Teachers should not set out to put across one point of view, which replaces education with propaganda. Instead, they should be giving pupils both knowledge and the ability to think about it and learn from it so they can arrive at their own conclusions.

But on the grounds that love for your country is wrong, many teachers have long stopped passing on to children the knowledge they need if they are to admire and identify with Britain. Somehow this has got mixed up with racism, xenophobia and the BNP.

REST HERE

CCTV operators help catch rapist

A POLISH national who cruised the streets of Barnsley at night seeking out his prey, raped a drunken schoolgirl who got into his car.

Olaf Kuspiel, aged 27, drove around Barnsley town centre in the early hours before offering to take the intoxicated 16-year-old home, Sheffield Crown Court heard.

Kuspiel, who was jailed for four years, then drove her to Hoyle Mill Country Park on the outskirts of the town, raped her and left her there.

The court heard the teen had been drinking vodka and cider on a night out - but after a row with friends stormed off on her own. She accepted the lift from Kuspiel after missing the last bus home.

The court heard the 16-year-old had little recollection of what happened after that but she remembered being raped in a car park.

Sarah Wright, prosecuting said: "She felt scared and Kuspiel then pushed her out of the car."The victim wandered around for a while before phoning police at about 3am.

Before the attack CCTV operators were so concerned about the girl as she staggered into the bus station that they zoomed their cameras in on her.

They watched as she was picked up by Kuspiel and managed to get a shot of his car registration number.

It eventually allowed police to trace and stop Kuspiel following the offence on Friday, May 9.

Miss Wright said Kuspiel initially accused the girl of assaulting him and claimed she 'violently' seduced him.

But in the light of DNA evidence he later pleaded guilty to one count of rape.Kuspiel, of Langdale Court, Oakwell, Barnsley, told police he picked the girl up because she had been crying.

He denied cruising the streets.

REST HERE

Jack Straw to take part in BBC debate with BNP leader Nick Griffin

Jack Straw's decision to share a platform with the BNP caused division in Labour's ranks last night.

The Justice Secretary has agreed to appear on the BBC's flagship political show Question Time alongside the far-Right party's leader Nick Griffin.

The move reverses Labour's long-held policy of not sharing a platform with the BNP.

And it has proved highly controversial with many MPs, who still feel the best way to defeat the BNP is by denying it the oxygen of publicity.

Mr Straw will appear on the programme with Mr Griffin on October 22. The debate will be broadcast from London amid tight security.

Mr Straw's Blackburn seat has previously been targeted by Mr Griffin's party because of its sizeable Muslim population.

Yesterday he insisted that Labour's past success in neutralising the BNP was because it had 'fought them hard'.

Mr Straw added: 'Wherever we have had BNP problems in my area and when we have fought them hard, we've pulled back and won the seats back. And that's what we have to do.

'We've got to make the argument for people and I am delighted to do so.'

Labour was forced to review its 'no platform' policy after the BBC announced it would invite the BNP to take part in Question Time following the party's success in this year's European Parliament elections, when it won two seats.

Many within Labour are angry at the BBC's decision to allow Mr Griffin, who has a criminal conviction for distributing material likely to incite racial hatred, a political voice.

Former Europe Minister Denis MacShane called the invitation an 'irresponsible gimmick' and urged MPs not to take part.

The Liberal Democrats and Conservatives have already said they will participate in the show, although it is not known who they will put forward to appear.

A Conservative spokesman said: 'We have seen the BNP do well in areas where people haven't been prepared to take them on.

'Now they are elected we have got to face up to that reality. We will take them on in argument and debate.'

Several Cabinet ministers, including Peter Hain and Alan Johnson, said they would not appear on Question Time if the BNP leader was invited.

And the anti-fascist group Searchlight called on all the main parties to refuse to take part in any edition of the show which included the BNP.

Tony Kearns, assistant general secretary of the Communication Workers Union said it was a 'disgrace' that the BBC was going ahead with offering the BNP a seat on Question Time despite a huge public outcry in recent weeks.

He also called on Government ministers and MPs to join protests against the decision.

Jon Cruddas, Labour MP for Dagenham, has led past campaigns against the BNP and said it was difficult to know how to respond to the appearance of the party on the show.

He told a fringe meeting at the Labour conference in Brighton yesterday: 'It's a high wire act. I don't know what the precise solution to this is.

'Over the years we've had a "no platform" thing with the BNP but that offers diminishing returns now because they're in forms of electoral representation that they never were when we devised that policy.'

Asked about Mr Straw's decision he said: 'I've never shared a platform with the BNP. But Jack's one of our most sophisticated and seasoned participants. He knows the BNP from his own back yard.

'I think he could take it to them and expose them.

'The real problem would be if we put up people who don't know what they are talking about when they deal with them.

READ THIS

SOURCE

MPs' expenses were leaked by mole angry over Government failure to equip troops properly

Details of MPs’ embarrassing expenses claims were leaked by a mole who was angry over the Government’s failure to equip troops properly, it has emerged.

The mole was among the workers responsible for processing the claims and worked alongside serving soldiers, who were moonlighting to earn extra cash for body armour and equipment.

The soldiers were outraged at the lavish claims of MPs, while British soldiers were risking their lives in Afghanistan, according to the Daily Telegraph.

The mole decided to hand over the CD-Roms with scans of every MP’s receipts dating back five years to former SAS officer John Wick, who sold it to the newspaper.

Mr Wick, who served in the elite special-forces regiment during the 1970s, was named as the man who blew the whistle on the expenses scandal earlier this year

The former SAS officer, who is now head of a corporate intelligence company, said he had decided to expose the system to its ‘rotten core’


The mole told the Daily Telegraph: 'It's not easy to watch footage on the television news of a coffin draped in a Union Jack and then come into work the next day and see on your computer screen what MPs are taking for themselves.

'Hearing from the serving soldiers, about how they were having to work there to earn enough money to buy themselves decent equipment, while the MPs could find public money to buy themselves all sorts of extravagances, only added to the feeling that the public should know what was going on.

'That helped tip the balance in the decision of whether I should or should not leak the expenses data.


As the days progressed the soldiers joined in the conversation and became as angry as those doing the editing.
'When they're out in Afghanistan they're out there for Queen and country, earning £16,000 or £17,000 a year, knowing they're going to take losses, while the MPs are sitting in Parliament on £65,000, with massive expenses, and meanwhile you've got bodies coming home.'

The Daily Telegraph’s publication of the unredacted expenses files in May this year triggered a major political scandal, which led to the resignations of several senior MPS and an overhaul of the entire system.

The claims caused widespread public outrage among the public against MPs and a crisis in confidence in the British political system.

It resulted in a large number of resignations, sackings, de-selections and retirement announcements, together with public apologies and the repayment of expenses.

Redacted files were due to be published this summer but practices such as MPs 'flipping' the address of second homes would never have been discovered if the files had not been leaked early.

The Daily Telegraph revealed that employees at The Stationery Office – where the MPs’ files were sent for censorship before their intended publication by parliament – reacted when they first saw the MP’s claims for second homes, furniture and luxury goods.

The workers, who included parliamentary staff on secondment, became so agitated that they had to be told by managers to calm down.

One of the expense claims which particularly enraged the workers was Gordon Brown’s claim for a Sky TV sports package, which cost £36 per month.

The Prime Minister, who faces a critical test of his leadership at next week’s Labour party conference, has faced repeated criticism over his failure to equip troops and for his lacklustre handling of the expenses scandal.

SOURCE

Labour Councillor's son is caught with cocaine

Just like Jack Straw eh?

THE son of an anti-drugs Midland councillor has been caught with crack cocaine just over a year after being convicted of carrying an imitation gun.

Labour councillor Elias Mattu was once responsible for improving community safety after being elected to Wolverhampton City Council.

Yet his son Anthony, 20, was recently ordered to pay a £115 fine and £60 courts costs for possession of the Class A drug.

And last June he was given a 16 week jail sentence, suspended for 12 months, after being caught with an imitation firearm and knife. He was also ordered to carry out 200 hours of unpaid community service.

Graiseley-based Coun Mattu spoke of his “disgust” at his son’s latest conviction but said he would not answer fresh calls for him to resign.

REST HERE

UK 'must accept jungle migrants'

Britain should be prepared to accept some migrants from the illegal camp in Calais known as "the jungle", a senior United Nations official has said.

High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres said the government should consider granting entry to those who already have large families in the UK.

He spoke after French officials said the camp would be shut down imminently.

The UK Border Agency said details of the closure were "matters for the French government".

The camp has replaced official centres like Sangatte as a gathering point for migrants hoping to cross to Britain.

Some 1,500 people, many of them from Iraq and Afghanistan, are now living in insanitary settlements close to the port.
'Granted protection'

France's Immigration Minister Eric Besson told French television that imminent closure of the 'jungle' would send a strong message that people traffickers could no longer use Calais.

The minister was due to hold talks on the issue with Mr Guterres on Thursday, but in the meantime, the high commissioner told the BBC the UK should be prepared to help France handle the closure.

"There will be situations in which we would recommend the British authorities consider the possibility, within reason, of receiving, for instance, people who have large families in Britain and things of this sort," he said.

UK Border Agency spokesman
"What I believe is important is that everybody that is in need of protection should be granted protection."

REST HERE

Attorney General (who helped draft foreign workers law) forced to sack illegal immigrant she hired as housekeeper

The minister in charge of prosecuting criminals has been employing an illegal immigrant.

For the past six months Attorney General Baroness Scotland has paid Loloahi Tapui, 27, from Tonga, to look after her large family home in West London. using the National Insurance number issued to her as a student.

Last night Lady Scotland denied knowing of her illegal status and fired her immediately.

But Lady Scotland could theoretically be prosecuted under laws that she is paid to enforce.

Even unknowingly employing an illegal is still an offence, punishable by a £10,000 fine, under legislation that she helped steer through Parliament as a Home Office minister in 2006.

As the most senior lawyer in England and Wales, the Attorney General is legal adviser to the Government and supervises all criminal prosecutions.

Confronted at Lady Scotland's home yesterday, Miss Tapui admitted she had overstayed her visa and was working illegally.

She confirmed that she had worked for the Attorney General for about six months and said the job was arranged by Lady Scotland's personal assistant.

Miss Tapui and Lady Scotland both confirmed that the housekeeper did pay tax and National Insurance on her wages.

The fact that Britain's top law officer could be so easily hoodwinked highlights the lax controls that critics claim are a feature of Labour's immigration policy.

The revelations are a grave personal embarrassment for Caribbean-born Lady Scotland - the first-ever female Attorney General - and could lead to calls for her to resign.

The case has echoes of former Home Secretary David Blunkett, who quit the cabinet in 2004 after it emerged that he sought to fast-track the visa application of his lover's Filipina nanny.

Two of Bill Clinton's nominees as U.S. Attorney General - both women - had to withdraw in 1993 after it emerged that they employed illegal immigrants as nannies and a home help.

Miss Tapui grew up on the remote island of Vava'u. As a citizen of Tonga - formerly part of the British Empire - she does not need a visa to spend fewer than six months in Britain as a tourist.

She was living in the UK in 2003 and successfully applied for a student visa, which entitled her to work legally.

However, her application a year later for an extension was turned down and she was told she should leave the country.

REST HERE

A Message to the Far Left UAF/Socialists from Anjem Choudary

Dangerous Demographics

Hat Tip: CT Crew

Defining British Nationalism

One of the ironies of the case against the BNP is that the Equality Commission are demanding the BNP clarify our 'whites only' membership policy, when the BNP doesnt have a whites only membership policy !

The BNP has an Indigenous British membership policy and assimilated Indigenous British membership

.At the same time as the Equality Commission are labouring under their own delusions as to what the BNP stand for, the White Nationalist mob on the various internet forums are demanding the BNP fight to the death for its 'white only' membership policy - which merely confirms these people are idiots and have never even bothered to read the BNP constitution as well as the Equality Commission.

Heres what the BNP constitution actually says ;

SECTION 2: MEMBERSHIP
1) The British National Party represents the collective national, environmental, political, racial, folkish, social, cultural, religious and economic interests of the indigenous Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Norse folk communities of Britain and those we regard as closely related and ethnically assimilated or assimilable aboriginal members of the European race also resident in Britain. Membership of the BNP is strictly defined within the terms of, and our members also self-define themselves within, the legal ambit of a defined ‘racial group’ this being ‘Indigenous Caucasian’ and defined ‘ethnic groups’ emanating from that Race as specified in law in the House of Lords case of Mandla v. Dowell Lee (1983) 1 ALL ER 1062, HL.2) The indigenous British ethnic groups deriving from the class of ‘Indigenous Caucasian’ consists of members of: i) the Anglo-Saxon folk community; ii) the Celtic Scottish folk community; iii) the Scots-Northern Irish folk community; iv) the Celtic Welsh folk community; v) the Celtic Irish folk community; vi) the Celtic Cornish folk community; vii) the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic folk community; viii) the Celtic-Norse folk community; ix) the Anglo-Saxon-Norse folk community; x) the Anglo-Saxon Indigenous European folk community; xi) members of these ethnic groups which reside either within or outside Europe but ethnically derive from them.

See what I mean - can you see where it says we have a 'whites only' membership

!What we have is an INDIGENOUS FOLK COMMUNITY membership which is not the same as a 'whites only' membership.A whites only membership would make the BNP a 'white nationalist' party not a BRITISH national party.

The fact that the idiots on some internet sites think the BNP is a white nationalist party, as opposed to a BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY for the indigenous British people, merely proves these people are too busy believing their own propaganda to realise they are talking nonsense.

The difference between a white nationalist party and the British National Party is that a white nationalist party would represent the interests of all whites worldwide, have no regard for the preservation of indigenous British culture and cultures and would allow any whites membership to the party such as unassimilated Poles and white Eastern Europeans and allow unlimited whites access in to the country.

Unfortunately most of those who call themselves British nationalists on sites like Stormfront are unable to understand even the basic nature of their own ideology - and how white nationalism is different to British Nationalism.

British Nationalism is a political movement designed to represent and promote the interests of the Indigenous British people, whilst white nationalism represents the interests of all whites worldwide.

This difference is of fundamental importance in relation to issues like immigration.

A white nationalist welcomes mass immigration into the UK as long as the immigrants are white eg Polish, Russians etc regardless of how this affects the interests of the indgenous British folk.

A white nationalist would never support the slogan 'British jobs for British workers' as that would mean that all immigration into the UK from white nations would have to be stopped and whites who are not British would be denied access to British jobs - whilst the fundamental aim of white nationalism is the compulsory repatriation of all non-whites and them replaced by whites from anywhere in the world, the fundamental aim of British nationalism os to put the interests of the British people first.

The fact that the policies of white nationalism if enacted into law would destroy British culture by importing into the country millions of culturally disparate whites from around the world to replace culturally british non-whites and at the same destroy the unique ethnic gene lines of the indigenous British folk groups via the mixing of the different ethnic sub sets of the white race into one homogenous racial enetity is irrelevant to white nationalists - white nationalists do not care that the indigenous British could become extinct in our own country along with British culture as long as Britain was filled with whites.

Only white nationalists regard British culture as irrelevant and disregard the fact that Polish people may be white, but that they are not indigenous British and that real genetic ethnic differences exist between us.

Polish people may easily assimilate into Britain and British culture and become British, but they are still of Polish ethnicity.

A simple DNA test can reveal whether we are Anglo-Saxon or Celts, or Italians or Germans thereby revealing that real genetic ethnic differences exist between the ethnic sub sets of the white race.

There is no one white race - the white race is comprised of a set of ethnic sub sets that have evolved from the original white racial root group.

Over time the different tribal groups that grew from the original racial root group have evolved real ethnic genetic differences that make them unique ethnic groups.

Therefore white nationalism and British Nationalism are diametrically opposed both in ideology and application.

The BNP want all immigration including white immigration from Europe stopped.

White nationalists want more white immigration into the UK.

The BNP want white Eastern European immigrants returned home.

White nationalists want white estern europeans to stay and non-whites returned home.

The BNP want all illegal immigrants, white or otherwise, returned home.

The white nationalists want whites to stay.A white nationalist would rather have in the country a white Eastern European Muslim than a Black British born Christian.

The BNP want all asylum seekers, white or otherwise, returned home.

White nationalists want white immigrants to stay.The BNP say Britain First - white nationalists say 'Our Race is our nation'.

The flag of the BNP is the British flag, the symbol of white nationalism is the Celtic Sun Wheel.

The political ideology of white nationalism is National Socialism, the politics of the BNP are British Nationalism.

You cannot say 'My race is my nation' and then say 'I am a British nationalist' - the two are fundamentally opposed and irreconcilable ideological positions.

The problem is that white nationalists have not realised this - so they think that when the BNP has to change its membership policy this is an abandonment of our 'white nationalist policy' when the BNP is not a white nationalist party anyway !

What we have have to do is therefore finally define what the BNP stands for in a way that British nationalists and white nationalists can see the difference.

After the constitution changes the BNP will still be an Indigenous British party based on ethno-nationalism which represents the interests of the indigenous British people.

But we will also be shifting emphasis onto the defence of British culture as well as indigenous rights.

This therefore shifts us further away from white nationalism.

There are in law two types of British citizens.

1) The Indigenous British whose citizenship status is based on Jus Sanguinis which is based on being British by bloodlineand

2) Naturalised British citizenship by Jus Solis which is where citizenship is bestowed via a court or other authority. The Naturalised British are divided into two camps - those who were born and raised in Britain, who are British in culture, christian by religion, who regard themselves as British and who want to live in a Britain with a British culture. Examples of these are the Black soldiers who volunteer for the British Army.

Then there is a third catergory - THE COLONISTS.

The colonists are those who are naturalised British or who are British citizens with naturalised British citizenship but also Dual Citizenship status based on Lex Sanguinis, who have a Right of Return to the homelands of their parents or grandparents and who have come to this nation not to assimilate but to impose their culture, religion, demands and values on the majority of indigenous British and the minority of naturalised British citizens.

Whilst the BNP represents the interests of the indigenous British it can also represent the interests of the Naturalised British citizens who are ASSIMILATED as we defend British culture.

The BNP cannot, and will not, ever represent the interests of Colonists.Assimilated British Naturalised Citizens want to defend British culture and values.
They do not want to see Sharia law in the UK, they do not want Islamist thugs spitting at British soldiers, including black British soldiers, on British streets, they dont want multi-culturalism as they want to live in a British culture, they dont want mass immigration as they know it will lead to a civil war in the future, they dont want to be given extra rights on the grounds of their race by white liberals who despise British culture, they dont want their kids taught about the joys of anal sex, they dont want their children sexualised by pervert teachers who think its more important that 5 year olds are taught how to wear a condom than to read and write properly, they dont want their taxes spent on refugee centres and translations services, they dont want British streets turned into war zones between different foriegn drugs gangs, they dont want crack gangs, white prostitutes, islamist heroin dealers and the rest of the filth of multi-culturalism perverting their children and British society, they dont white liberal teachers teaching their kids to have a chip on their shoulder about racism and that they dont have to work hard at school as they can be rap stars or unemployed drug dealers, they dont want their kids taught about Islam and not about Christianity, they want free speech not political correctness and liberalism.

They want a decent British society with a mono-cultural British culture, not a multi-cultural society with no British culture.

They are not the enemy.

Between them and us we share a mutual desire for the return of our British culture.The aim of any constitutional change must be to create an alliance based on them and us defending British culture.

Whilst the primary aim of the BNP will always be to represent the interests of the indigenous British people, the BNP must also create a mass social movement for the preservation of British culture that enables us to bridge this gap.

The real irony is that the white nationalists are multi-culturalists - they would rather have a multi-cultural Britain comprised of Polish, Russian, German immigrants who retain their own ancestral cultures, than a Britain with a British culture if that means we have to have a tiny minority of non-whites who are British by birth and culture.

White Nationalism is by its very nature a multi-cultural ideology, for it puts the issue of race before the preservation of national cultures.

The irony is that when white nationalists say 'my race is my nation' this statement is anti-nationalist, anti-the British indigenous folk communities and anti-British culture.

Even the politics of white nationalism - National Socialism - are despised by the majority of British whites who we need to vote us into power.

Its a pity they do not analyse this statement

SOURCE Lee John Barnes

Plea over councillor expenses as claims top £1m

TAXPAYERS across the region have paid more than £1m for councillors' expenses as vast differences in the cost of the annual bills emerged between local authorities.

SEE AN INTERESTING CHART OF COUNCILLOR EXPENSES HERE Note how Bradford & Kirklees Council's are amongst the highest in the region and the obvious drop in claims from Barnsley Council as Labour loose more seats.

Campaigners have now called for greater transparency to ensure the public's cash is being used efficiently and effectively.

A Yorkshire Post investigation has revealed nearly £1.2m of taxpayers' money has been used to cover the cost of members' expenses for the region's 22 councils during the last two financial years.

Vast differences have emerged with two councils topping the £100,000 mark, while other local authorities have cost the taxpayer less than £1,000 in annual claims.

While most authorities have posted a summary of members' expenses on their websites, campaigners from The Taxpayers' Alliance have called for a more detailed analysis to be readily available to the public.

Taxpayers' Alliance campaigns director Mark Wallace claimed a similar picture had emerged nationally. "Of course, councillors should be reimbursed for legitimate and reasonable expenses essential to representing their voters.

"All details of councillors' allowances should be published receipt by receipt, so that the public can see exactly where their money is going."

A survey conducted by the Yorkshire Post of the expense accounts of the region's councillors has analysed claims made for travel, hotel accommodation, subsistence, internet and telephone costs plus child care.

The region's highest annual claim was made by Coun John Berry, who represents Brigg and Wolds on North Lincolnshire Council. He claimed £8,286 for travel and subsistence during 2007/08, and £5,034 in the last financial year.

Among the other claims was more than £8,000 for car mileage by North Yorkshire County Council member Helen Swiers, while former Leeds Council leader Mark Harris claimed in excess of £320 to visit London for Romanian Independence Day.

Rotherham councillor Mahroof Hussain had a flight and hotel in Los Angeles paid for when he attended the British-American Project's annual conference in November 2008. He also claimed £228 for a hotel room and breakfast when he went to an anti-drugs conference in Romania.

REST HERE

REGIONAL COUNCILLOR EXPENSES CHART

CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO VIEW FULL SIZE CHART

Pair held on trafficking and rape charges

A JUDGE remanded two men in custody after they appeared before him accused of trafficking a woman into the country for sexual exploitation.

Jacek Sokolowski and Tomasz Slabaszewski appeared at Swindon Crown Court on Friday and denied several allegations which were put to them through a Polish interpreter.

Sokolowski, 42, of Ascham Road, Grange Park, pleaded not guilty to trafficking for sexual exploitation, false imprisonment, causing or inciting prostitution for gain, rape and assault by beating.

Slabaszewski, 31, of Whitworth Road, Pinehurst, denied trafficking for sexual exploitation, false imprisonment, causing or inciting prostitution for gain and five counts of rape.

REST HERE